Is it reasonable to do nothing in response to a foreseeable risk?Author : Paul Spezza, Lilian See and Matt BoyceGeneral Liability
Last week the ACT Court of Appeal found in favour of an occupier of a car park in a negligence case: Jennings v George Harcourt Management Pty Ltd  ACTCA 50. The decision is a reminder that the issues of ‘foreseeable risk’ and ‘reasonable response’ must not be conflated when considering whether a party has breached its duty of care. This case is important for insurers and their insureds in reiterating that sometimes ‘doing nothing’ is an entirely reasonable response to a foreseeable risk.
Click below to download our full summary and learnings.26/11/2018